Skip to content
  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 2 results.

Regulatory and Commercial Obsolescence Risks of Materials and Processes journal article open-access

Paavo Heiskanen, Premysl Janik, Oliver Reiff-Musgrove, Mikko Nikulainen, Tim Becker

International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review, Volume 3 (2020), Issue 1, Page 3 - 13

This article summarises the current challenges related to legal obligations and restrictions associated with the use of chemicals, directly affecting space industrial sector. It also highlights issues surrounding the obsolescence of materials and processes, which are indirectly linked to the restrictions in use, but often have a serious impact on the space industry. Methods for risk assessment and means for the mitigation of risks associated with material and process obsolescence are described in the article. The most relevant substances under restrictions are discussed in detail. Lastly, the evolution in waste management, as well as some implications of the UK withdrawal from the EU are additionally analysed.


The SCIP Database under Directive (EU) 2018/851 journal article

Do ECHA’s Detailed Information Requirements Cross the Legal Boundaries?

Tim Becker

International Chemical Regulatory and Law Review, Volume 2 (2019), Issue 4, Page 147 - 156

With the forthcoming database on substances of concern in articles as such or in complex objects (products) (hereafter SCIP database) the EU’s co-legislators have introduced a highly ambitious project for all parties involved at the EU, national and global level. The requirement is set out in Article 9(1)(i) and (2) of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, as revised by Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 (hereafter Waste Framework Directive, WFD or revised WFD). At its recent SCIP workshop 2019the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) presented and discussed with numerous participants from industry, authorities and NGOs the current state of play of the database, which ECHA should establish by 5 January 2020. In particular, the scope of ECHA’s detailed information requirements for SCIP notifications was criticized from the industry side for exceeding legal boundaries, while others argued in support of the ECHA plans. This question is of high practical relevance. Essentially, the issue at stake is whether industry can rely on existing systems and data already communicated under Article 33(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), or whether additional data has to be collected from often long and complex global supply chains for the purpose of SCIP notifications, which are due as from 5 January 2021. Against this background, the present article aims to take a closer look at the legal background for the new SCIP provisions and discuss ECHA’s detailed information requirements from a legal point of view, based on the underlying rationale of the European Commission (EC). We will see that the role of recitals in EU law for the interpretation of enacting terms is one of the key legal issues raised in this context.

  • «
  • 1
  • »